Nazi.

The word names a specific party-state. It also gets thrown into public discourse as a present-tense synonym for "person I oppose."

Range of the word

Nazi is short for Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers' Party, NSDAP). The party's 25-point program, proclaimed by Adolf Hitler on February 24, 1920, outlined its goals: the unification of all Germans in a Greater Germany, abrogation of the Treaty of Versailles, land and territory for colonization, and citizenship limited by race.¹ Point 4 stated: "Only a member of the race can be a citizen. A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood, without consideration of creed. Consequently no Jew can be a member of the race."²

The Nazi regime (1933–1945) enacted laws that restricted citizenship and prohibited mixed marriages. The Nuremberg Laws of 1935 restricted citizenship to persons of "German- or kindred blood"³ and prohibited "marriages between Jews and nationals of German or kindred blood."⁴ The regime carried out the Holocaust: the systematic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of six million European Jews, and millions of other victims.⁵

The word has a range. It names the NSDAP, the Third Reich, and the ideology and atrocities of that regime.

What it names as description

When nazi describes, it names the historical party-state:

• The NSDAP and the Third Reich. The party platform established racial citizenship in Point 4. The regime enacted laws that restricted citizenship and prohibited mixed marriages. The regime carried out the Holocaust: the systematic murder of six million European Jews and millions of other victims.

When the word describes, it anchors to a verifiable historical object.

What it does as a substitute

When nazi substitutes, the speaker does not name the historical referent or the mechanism. The word announces a present-tense verdict.

Example substitutions:

• "That policy is nazi." Which features of the NSDAP platform or the Third Reich does the policy share? If the speaker cannot name the mechanism, the word is not describing.
• "He is a nazi." What did he do or advocate that aligns with the NSDAP program or the Third Reich? If the conduct cannot be named, the word is a character charge.
• "This law is nazi." Which elements of the law match the Nuremberg Laws or other Nazi legislation? If the comparison cannot be opened, the word is a slogan.

The substitution does work. It reallocates the burden of proof. The speaker no longer has to show how the policy or conduct aligns with the historical regime. The accused must now prove they are not the character named. Inquiry ends. The controversy is no longer about the policy or conduct under discussion, but about the moral standing of the person or institution charged.

When the charge is not a substitute

The charge is not a substitute when:

• The speaker names the historical object (the NSDAP, the Third Reich, the Nuremberg Laws) and shows how the conduct or policy aligns with that object.
• The claim is bound to an opened primary. If the policy text, the speech, or the institutional record shows alignment with Nazi ideology (racial citizenship, etc.), the word describes.
• The historical record is unambiguous: the Nazi regime carried out the Holocaust, murdering six million European Jews and millions of others in a systematic genocide. When the word nazi names that regime and its atrocities, it is not a substitute.

The distinction is: does the word name a checkable object, or does it replace the controversy with a verdict?

The test

If someone claims a policy, person, or government is nazi, the test is:

1. Name the historical referent. Which features of the NSDAP platform, the Third Reich, or the Nuremberg Laws does the object share?
2. Name the mechanism. What does the policy or conduct do? How does it operate?
3. Name the unit. What is the domain? A law, a party, a movement, a government?
4. Open the primary. Is there a document, a speech, or a record that shows the alignment?

If the speaker cannot produce these, the word is not describing. It is load-bearing.

This is the same discipline the Admiralty Code enforces: score the source and the claim independently. A historical regime can be named accurately or inaccurately. The test is whether the primary can be opened.

Charitable interpretation comes first. If the speaker has opened a primary and shown the mechanism, the word is describing. If the speaker has not, the word is doing work other than naming a fact.

---

Related reading: Load-bearing terms · Fascist.

Footnotes

1. National Socialist German Workers' Party, 25-Point Program (1920), reproduced in Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Vol. IV, Doc. 1708-PS. Available at https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/1708-ps.asp. ↩

2. NSDAP 25-Point Program, supra, Point 4. ↩

3. Reich Citizenship Law, 15 September 1935, reproduced in Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Vol. IV, Doc. 1416-PS. Available at https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/1416-ps.asp. ↩

4. Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor, 15 September 1935, reproduced in Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Vol. IV, Doc. 2000-PS. Available at https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/2000-ps.asp. ↩

5. U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, "Introduction to the Holocaust," https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/introduction-to-the-holocaust (documenting the systematic murder of six million European Jews and millions of others, including Roma (Gypsies), Poles, Soviet prisoners of war, people with disabilities, and political opponents). ↩