CASCADE Sweep: Chapter 9 of the Casey Review

A sectional CASCADE pass through Chapter 9 of the Casey Review (2023), sampling contradictions across the chapter's two bank-supported discrimination topics — racism and sexism/misogyny — to surface a pattern a single-finding trace cannot.

AppliedCompleteApplied8 May 202624 min read

On this page13 sections

CASCADE Sweep: Chapter 9 of the Casey Review

What this article is and isn't

This article applies the CASCADE method sectionally to one chapter of the Baroness Casey Review (March 2023): Chapter 9, titled "Discrimination". It is a chapter sweep, not a verdict on the Met and not a single-finding trace. The single-finding pattern is the sister article (casey-finding). The chapter sweep walks two of the chapter's three institutional findings — sexism and misogyny (§9.2) and racism (§9.3) — and surfaces six contradictions across those two topics.

The chapter's third institutional finding — institutional homophobia (§9.1) — is named in the chapter summary but is not bank-supported. The article's coverage of Chapter 9 is, for that reason, partial; §2 scopes 9.1 out explicitly. A future sweep could extend to it; this one does not.

Quote IDs (Q-XXX) and contradiction IDs (C-XXX) cited below refer to the shared evidence bank that backs the three Casey applied traces. The bank is internal; the references in this article are reader-facing identifiers.

A sectional sweep on one chapter cannot generalise to Casey 2023 as a whole. What it can do is make a structural pattern visible across two topics in one chapter — a thing a single-finding trace, by construction, cannot. The cross-temporal counterpart is the third article in the set (casey-macpherson, draft).

The chapter at a glance

Casey opens Chapter 9 with the chapter's stated finding:

"We have identified institutional homophobia, misogyny and racism, and other forms of discrimination in the Met. But the Met has only reluctantly accepted discrimination and has preferred to put this down to a minority of 'bad apples.'"

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 234, Chapter 9 summary, opening paragraph. (Direct from the published chapter; not in the shared evidence bank — used here as chapter-scoping framing, not as a bank-cited factual claim.)

Three institutional findings are named in that opening: homophobia, misogyny, racism. The chapter is then organised into four sub-chapters: §9.1 Homophobia (p. 243-257), §9.2 Sexism and Misogyny (p. 258-285), §9.3 Racism (p. 286-329), and §9.4 Conclusions on discrimination (p. 330). The article's evidentiary bank covers two of those four — §9.2 and §9.3. That structural fact bounds the article.

Mapping the chapter's sub-sections onto the bank's topic slugs:

§9.1 Homophobia — no bank coverage. Article B does not extend to it.
§9.2 Sexism and Misogyny — bank topic misogyny-gender. Walked in §4 below.
§9.3 Racism — bank topic institutional-racism. Walked in §3 below.
§9.4 Conclusions on discrimination — closes the chapter; no contradictions classified separately.

The article's scope discipline cashes out in three further bounds. First, the foreword and executive-summary material at the front of Casey 2023 (Q-021 at p. 7; Q-028 at p. 16 in the bank) is not Chapter 9 content and is not used here. Second, Operation Soteria Bluestone evidence inside Chapter 5.13 (Q-030 at p. 164) is also not Chapter 9 content; the bank's classification of C-010 lists it as a rebuttal, but Article B's chapter-sweep discipline excludes it from the in-chapter evidentiary span. Third, Macpherson 1999 quotes (Q-018, Q-019) are out-of-chapter on a more important axis still — they are the spine of the cross-temporal sister article (casey-macpherson, draft) — and are referenced in §3 only as pointers, not quoted.

What remains, after those bounds are applied, is the article's working span: ten in-chapter Q-IDs (five per topic, including the chapter-closing finding for each) plus one cross-document rebuttal quote (Q-033, from the Met-authored Analytical Report of October 2022) which enters §4 as the documentary half of one contradiction only.

Topic 1 — Institutional racism

Chapter 9.3 of the Casey Review documents an institutional finding of racism that the Met itself, in two distinct stated positions cited within the same chapter, contests in scope and frames as already being addressed; the chapter then evidences both contests against the chapter's own data and concluding finding. The chapter's terminal claim is set out in §9.3.5:

"These point to a collective and continued failure by the Met to understand, accept and address the existence of racism at all levels in the organisation. We have found complacency in the Met to tackle problems, a lack of curiosity about what people of colour are telling them; and a wilful blindness to seeing the evidence all around them, within and outside the Met. [...] We have found institutional racism in the Metropolitan Police."

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 329, Section 9.3.5 'Conclusion', closing line of the chapter. Q-022

The walk below sets two Met-stated positions cited inside §9.3.1 against the chapter-internal evidence at §9.3.3 and §9.3.4 and the closing finding above. Three contradictions surface; each is classified in the section's closing sub-section.

Met-stated positions inside the chapter

Casey reproduces two Met-stated positions in the chapter's introduction, eighteen pages before the closing finding. The first is then-Commissioner Cressida Dick's denial, given as oral evidence to the Home Affairs Committee on 8 July 2020:

"Back to how far the Met has come, we have come an enormous way. I say to other people that if you want to call us institutionally racist, that is a matter for you, but it is not a label I find helpful, as I have told this Committee before. We are not collectively failing in all the ways described in Sir William's definition. There is no collective failure. It is not a massive systemic problem. It is not institutionalised."

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 287, Section 9.3.1 'Introduction', Casey quoting Dame Cressida Dick QPM giving oral evidence to the Home Affairs Committee 'Macpherson 22 years on', 8 July 2020 (footnote 182). Q-025

Dick's framing invokes Macpherson's definition ("Sir William's definition") and rejects each of its component formulations in turn — collective failure, systemic problem, institutionalisation. It is a denial of the chapter's eventual finding, recorded in the chapter as a Met-stated position cited within the chapter rather than as Casey's own assertion.

The second Met-stated position is Acting Commissioner Sir Stephen House's 2022 reform claim, made on the launch of the National Police Race Action Plan:

"We recognise the Met is not yet free of discrimination, racism or bias, but we are changing to build a Met which is."

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 287, Section 9.3.1 'Introduction', Casey quoting Acting Commissioner Sir Stephen House from the Metropolitan Police Service 2022 statement on the launch of the National Police Race Action Plan (footnote 183). Q-026

House's framing is reform-progress rather than denial: an acknowledgement that the institution is "not yet" free of discrimination paired with a stated trajectory of change. Casey reproduces both quotes inside §9.3.1 as the institutional positions the rest of §9.3 is set against.

Chapter-internal evidence

Casey's §9.3.4 reports the operational metric the chapter uses to test the reform-progress claim:

"In every year since 2016, those between 11 and 61 who appear to be Black have been at least 3.5 times more likely to be stopped and searched by the Met than their White counterparts. In the previous year, 1 in 4 Black males aged 15-24 in London were stopped and searched in a three-month period. This is broadly the same level of disproportionality described in the Macpherson Inquiry in 1999."

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 317, Section 9.3.4 'The Met and Black Londoners', sub-section on stop and search, paragraph beginning 'In every year since 2016'. Q-023

The metric is stop-and-search disparity, reported as "broadly the same level" across a span of years that reaches back to Macpherson's 1999 baseline. Q-023 internalises the comparative claim; the article does not need to cite Macpherson directly to surface it.

§9.3.3 then reports the Met's own workforce-survey data, alongside the institution's continuing scope claim:

"The Met continues to say that only a tiny minority of officers display discriminatory behaviour. But our survey of Met officers and staff found a different picture:

46% of Black and 33% of Asian Met respondents report personally experiencing racism while at work

Only 18% of Black Met respondents think the Met treats everyone who works there fairly regardless of race, compared with 63% of White employees surveyed"

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 305, Section 9.3.3 'The Met's workforce; the internal culture', sub-heading 'Experience of racism in the Met'. Q-024

Q-024 carries a structural feature worth surfacing: it contains, in a single passage, both a Met-stated position ("only a tiny minority of officers display discriminatory behaviour") and the Casey workforce-survey rebuttal (the 46%/33%/18%/63% figures). The Met's framing and the survey result sit inside the same paragraph in Casey's text. The pairing is not assembled from two locations by the article; it is the way Casey reports the contest in §9.3.3.

Contradictions classified

Three contradictions surface across §9.3, each inside the chapter's own evidentiary span.

C-008. Casey records the Met's continuing position that "only a tiny minority of officers display discriminatory behaviour" (Q-024) against the same review's workforce-survey data (also Q-024, in the same passage) and the chapter-closing finding (Q-022). The bank classifies this as Pattern C: Mutually Exclusive Findings — INTER_DOC-2C. In the bank's voice: "'tiny minority' and survey rates of 33-46% within the Met's own workforce are mutually incompatible quantifications." The bank treats the contradiction as INTER_DOC because the Met's "tiny minority" framing is the institution's cross-document position rather than a Casey assertion. Controller note (raised at bank-review): the rebuttal-quote (Q-024) is also where the claim-quote lives, which is structurally unusual — Casey records the Met's stated position and the rebutting workforce data within a single passage. The bank's classification is sound; the structural one-passage feature is recorded as a sweep-style observation, not as a defect.

C-006. The Met's institutional position underwent a position reversal between Macpherson 1999 and Dick's 2020 denial (Q-025), and Casey 2023's chapter-closing finding (Q-022) re-finds the position Dick rejected. The bank classifies this as Type 8A: Factual Reversal — UNEXPLAINED_CHANGE-8A. In the bank's voice: "Dick's denial does not cite, address, or distinguish Macpherson's definition, despite invoking it; no new evidence is offered for the change in position; and the subsequent Casey finding establishes that the 2020 reversal was not justified by underlying conditions." Controller note (raised at bank-review): the 8A classification rests on the full 1999 → 2020 → 2023 arc, of which Article B walks only the in-chapter slice (Q-025 at §9.3.1 → Q-022 at §9.3.5). The full cross-temporal reach (Macpherson 1999 → Dick 2020 → Casey 2023) is the spine of casey-macpherson, draft and is deferred there. The bank's classification is retained at full strength; Article B carries the in-chapter slice and points the reader to the cross-temporal article for the rest.

C-007. Sir Stephen House's 2022 reform claim (Q-026) is set against Casey's §9.3.4 stop-and-search disparity statistic (Q-023). The bank classifies this as Pattern C: Mutually Exclusive Findings — INTER_DOC-2C. In the bank's voice: "the reform claim and the empirical finding of static disproportionality across 24 years are mutually exclusive characterisations." Controller note (raised at bank-review): within the in-chapter slice, C-007's rebuttal reduces to Q-023 alone (Casey's 2016-2023 stop-and-search disparity statistic). The bank's original C-007 pairing reaches further — to Q-019 from Macpherson 1999, establishing the 24-year persistence of the disparity at the same level. That cross-temporal reach is the spine of casey-macpherson, draft and is deferred there. Within Article B, C-007's force is bounded to: a Met-stated reform claim (Q-026, House 2022) is contradicted by Casey's same-chapter operational metric (Q-023, 2016-2023 disparity unchanged). The persistence claim across decades requires Article C; the in-chapter slice is what Article B carries.

The three contradictions sit on a single axis. Met-stated positions are on one side: Dick's 2020 denial (Q-025), House's 2022 reform claim (Q-026), and the "tiny minority" framing Casey records as the institution's continuing position (Q-024 first half). In-chapter Casey evidence is on the other: stop-and-search disparity at the 2016-2023 cut (Q-023), the workforce-survey result (Q-024 second half), and the chapter-closing finding (Q-022). §4 walks the same axis on a different topic.

Topic 2 — Misogyny and gender

Chapter 9.2 of the Casey Review documents an institutional finding of sexism and misogyny that the Met itself, in stated positions made eight months apart and reproduced or rebutted within the chapter, denied as a culture and framed as a listened-to concern; the chapter and a same-publisher report from the same year evidence both stated positions against in-chapter and same-year base rates. The chapter's terminal claim is set out in §9.2.9:

"The Review finds the Met to be institutionally sexist and misogynistic."

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 285, Section 9.2.9 'Conclusion', closing finding (final sentence of the Sexism and Misogyny chapter). Q-027

The walk below sets two Met-stated positions cited inside the chapter against in-chapter Casey-survey evidence and one same-year Met-authored rebuttal quote (the only cross-document quote the article uses, and the only point at which the chapter sweep crosses out of Chapter 9). Three contradictions surface.

Met-stated positions inside the chapter

The first Met-stated position is a Met spokesperson statement, made on 1 February 2022 in response to a media report on the IOPC's Operation Hotton Learning Report. Casey reproduces it via footnote 164:

"We do not believe there is a culture of misogyny in the Met…[In] an organisation of more than 44,000 people there will be a small number with attitudes and beliefs that are not welcome in the Met; we will challenge, educate and discipline as appropriate."

— Met spokesperson statement (1 February 2022, as reported by The Guardian); Casey reproduces this via footnote 164. Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 272, Section 9.2.5 'Life for women in the Met'. Q-031

The attribution chain is four steps: a Met spokesperson statement made on 1 February 2022; The Guardian's same-day report on the IOPC Operation Hotton Learning Report, in which the spokesperson statement was reproduced; Casey footnote 164, citing the Guardian piece; and Casey p. 272 at §9.2.5, where the spokesperson statement is reproduced via that footnote. The spokesperson framing is denial-of-culture: a "small number with attitudes and beliefs" within an institution of more than 44,000 people, set against a position that there is no culture of misogyny.

The second Met-stated position is the Met's 4 April 2022 statement on its enhanced response to violence against women and girls, made roughly two months after the spokesperson statement above:

"We have listened carefully. The feedback was clear. Londoners want to see more about the work we're doing to build trust with women and girls across London so they can be confident that when they report violence and abuse we will take it seriously. This is really important to us too and we have set out how we will achieve this in our plan."

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 259, Section 9.2.1 'Introduction', Casey quoting the Metropolitan Police Service statement of 4 April 2022 on the 'enhanced response to tackling violence against women and girls in London' (footnote 151). Q-032

The framing is listening-and-trust: a stated posture of having listened carefully to feedback and a stated trajectory of building trust with women and girls in London. Casey reproduces it inside §9.2.1, eighteen pages before the chapter-closing finding above.

Chapter-internal evidence

Casey's §9.2.5 reports the Met's own female workforce's experience of the institution:

"a third (33%) of women in the Met who responded to the survey report personally experiencing sexism at work [...] 12% report directly experiencing sexual harassment or assault."

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 267, Section 9.2.5 'Life for women in the Met', Review survey findings box. Q-029

The survey populates the in-chapter rebuttal axis for the §9.2 walk: a Met-evidenced base rate (Met women surveyed by Casey) against the Met-stated denial of culture and the Met-stated listening-and-trust framing.

The cross-document rebuttal that anchors §4's strongest contradiction is not in Chapter 9. It is in the Met's own Analytical Report (October 2022), Section 6, eight months after the spokesperson statement above:

"Surveys conducted in two BCUs, by BCU management teams who wanted to better understand the scale and extent of sexism and misogyny in order to tackle the problems, highlighted some of the behaviours officers and staff are putting up with on a daily basis. In one BCU, the survey found that 22% of public protection officers who responded and 37% of those who responded in the Emergency Response and Patrol Team (ERPT) had experienced unwanted sexual advances or touching. In the other BCU, 47% of female employees who responded to a survey said they had experienced sexism and misogyny in the last six months."

— Met Analytical Report (October 2022), p. 14, Section 6 'There is sexism and misogyny in the misconduct system', paragraph reporting BCU survey results. Q-033

Q-033 enters Article B as the rebuttal source for one contradiction (C-009) and only that contradiction. It is not chapter content; the article cites it as the Met-authored, same-publisher, same-year cross-document evidence that the spokesperson statement of 1 February 2022 sits alongside. The chapter sweep crosses out of Chapter 9 at this single point and returns.

A further chapter-sweep observation surfaces in §9.2 itself: Casey's Operation Rainier sub-section, at p. 282, reports vetting findings that the bank tags vetting-conduct rather than misogyny-gender:

"42 of 452 (9%) individuals included in their investigations were linked in some way to allegations of sexual misconduct or domestic abuse at the point of initial vetting to join the Met [...] In 34 cases where there was a link to an allegation, the vetting team in the Met had not shared this information so it was not on the misconduct intelligence system [...] There were at least two cases which were in line with approved practice, but in which applicants had been let in despite previous convictions or acquittals for rape having been identified. These individuals later came to the attention of DPS due to sexual misconduct."

— Baroness Casey Review (March 2023), p. 282, Section 9.2 'Sexism and misogyny', sub-section 'Operation Rainier – the Met's review of sexual misconduct cases', bulleted findings under heading 'Vetting:'. Q-016

Q-016's bank topic is vetting-conduct, but Casey filed it inside §9.2 — the misogyny chapter. The cross-topic placement is itself a chapter-sweep observation: Casey's chapter structure does not respect the bank's topic taxonomy cleanly, and the sectional sweep is the lens that surfaces this. The article treats Q-016 as supporting context for §9.2's institutional finding rather than as a separate contradiction; its inclusion sits in §4 only because Casey put it there.

Contradictions classified

Three contradictions surface across §9.2, each in line with the bank's classification chain.

C-009. A Met spokesperson statement on 1 February 2022 (Q-031, as Casey reproduces it at p. 272) is set against the Met's own Analytical Report of October 2022 (Q-033, Section 6, BCU surveys). The bank classifies this as Pattern C: Mutually Exclusive Findings — INTER_DOC-2C. In the bank's voice: this is "the strongest cross-Met-source contradiction in the corpus and the spine of any misogyny argument", and "a denial of culture and Met-evidenced base rates of 22-47% in the same workforce are mutually exclusive findings." Both halves are Met-stated, eight months apart, definitively cross-document — the same institution, different documents, same year. Controller note (raised at bank-review): the eight-month interval between the two Met-stated positions is itself the analytical structure — neither halving the interval nor doubling it would change the classification, because the two propositions (denial of culture; in-Met workforce base rates of 22-47%) cannot be reconciled at any temporal grain. The contradiction's strength rests on Q-033 being from the same publisher (Met HQ Strategy & Governance) within the same year as Q-031, with no intervening institutional statement reconciling them.

C-011. The Met's 4 April 2022 VAWG statement (Q-032) is set against Casey's §9.2.5 survey of women in the Met (Q-029). The bank classifies this as Pattern C: Mutually Exclusive Findings — INTER_DOC-2C. In the bank's voice: "an organisation that has not built safety for its female employees cannot have credibly built trust with female members of the public." The pairing is the cleanest in-chapter contradiction in §4 — claim and rebuttal both inside Chapter 9 (Q-032 at §9.2.1, Q-029 at §9.2.5). Controller note (raised at bank-review): the in-chapter contradiction Q-032 → Q-029 stands without further bank-side caveat beyond the standard "single-chapter sweep cannot generalise" disclaimer surfaced in §1. The claim/rebuttal pairing is internally bounded to the chapter and uses no out-of-chapter material.

C-010. The Met's 4 April 2022 VAWG statement (Q-032) is also set against the chapter-closing finding (Q-027). The bank classifies this as Pattern C: Mutually Exclusive Findings — INTER_DOC-2C. In the bank's voice: the Met's listening/seriousness claim and Casey's three independent findings of de-prioritisation, institutional misogyny, and an endemic culture of disbelieving victims "cannot both be accurate accounts of the same institution at the same time." Controller note (raised at bank-review): the bank's full rebuttal set for C-010 is [Q-027, Q-028, Q-030], but Q-028 is foreword material (p. 16, not Chapter 9) and Q-030 is in Chapter 5.13 (Operation Soteria Bluestone, p. 164, not Chapter 9). Article B's chapter-sweep discipline omits both as out-of-chapter. Within the in-chapter span, C-010 reduces to Q-032 → Q-027 alone. The bank's classification is licensed by all three rebuttals; the article cites it at full strength and notes the in-chapter bound on the evidentiary span.

The three contradictions sit on the same axis as §3. Met-stated positions are on one side: the spokesperson denial of misogyny culture (Q-031) and the VAWG listening-and-trust statement (Q-032). In-chapter Casey evidence is on the other: the survey of women in the Met (Q-029) and the chapter-closing finding (Q-027). One same-publisher same-year Met-evidenced rebuttal sits beside it (Q-033, Met Analytical Report October 2022 BCU surveys). The structural shape is the parallel to §3.

Patterns across the chapter

Three contradictions in §3, three in §4. Five tagged INTER_DOC-2C (Pattern C: Mutually Exclusive Findings) and one tagged UNEXPLAINED_CHANGE-8A (Type 8A: Factual Reversal, in-chapter slice only). The shape repeats across both topics: a Met-stated position — denial of scope (the "tiny minority" framing recorded inside Q-024), denial of culture (Q-031 spokesperson), or reform-progress / listening claim (Q-026 House, Q-032 VAWG) — set against in-chapter Casey-evidenced data (workforce surveys at Q-024 and Q-029, the operational disparity metric at Q-023, or the chapter-closing institutional finding at Q-022 and Q-027). One same-publisher same-year cross-document Met source enters at one point only (Q-033 in §4's C-009).

The shape is not coincidental. Casey's chapter structure mirrors across §9.2 and §9.3: an introduction citing Met-stated positions (§9.x.1), chapter evidence inside the body (§9.x.3, §9.x.4, §9.x.5), and a chapter-closing institutional finding at the end (§9.2.9, §9.3.5). The structural parallel between the two topics is by chapter design, not by article framing.

What this surfaces that a single-finding trace cannot. Article A traces a single contradiction-cluster within one topic (complaints-handling). It can establish that one Met-internal pairing exists. It cannot establish that the same shape recurs — the single-topic discipline forbids it. Article B traces six contradictions across two topics inside one chapter. It can establish that the shape recurs across two protected-characteristic axes (race and sex/gender), and that the recurrence is set up by the chapter's documentary structure. The two-axis recurrence inside one chapter is the strongest claim a chapter sweep can make. It is bank-licensed, tightly bounded, and the article's value-add over the focused-trace pattern.

What the sweep does not surface. First, it does not establish that institutional racism and institutional misogyny share the same causal mechanism inside the Met. The structural pattern is in Casey's documentary record, not in the underlying institutional behaviour. Two contradictions can have the same documentary shape and different causes; the sweep does not adjudicate. Second, the sweep does not establish that all six contradictions are equally well-evidenced in the chapter-internal sense. C-009 and C-011 are in-chapter on both halves (C-009's rebuttal Q-033 sits just outside Chapter 9, but inside the same Met-authored corpus from the same year); C-008 has both halves in one Casey-cited passage; C-006 has only one half in the chapter, with the rest deferred to Article C; C-007 has one rebuttal omitted as out-of-chapter (Q-019, Macpherson 1999); C-010 has two rebuttals omitted (Q-028 foreword, Q-030 Chapter 5). The bank's classifications are uniform across the six; the article's chapter-sweep discipline produces a non-uniform evidentiary span, and §3 and §4 surface that non-uniformity in the controller notes. Third, the sweep does not extend to §9.1 (institutional homophobia). The chapter's third finding is named in the chapter summary and absent from the bank. A reader who treats Article B as a complete chapter audit is mis-reading the article.

The three articles in the applied set trace three different structural axes on the same documentary corpus. casey-finding is the focused-trace counterpart: one topic, one anchor contradiction, one Met-internal SELF-1C pivot inside a single document. casey-macpherson, draft is the cross-temporal counterpart: one institutional finding (institutional racism) traced across 24 years (1999 → 2020 → 2023), the full arc of C-006 that this article only touches in slice. Article B is the chapter-sweep axis; A and C are not. Read alongside, not in place of.

Source notes

The eleven Q-IDs cited in §2-§4 resolve to the table below. Document, page, and locator are quoted from the shared evidence bank.

Q-ID	Document	Page / locator
Q-022	Baroness Casey Review, Baroness Casey Review of the Standards of Behaviour and Internal Culture of the Metropolitan Police Service — Final Report (March 2023)	p. 329, Section 9.3.5 'Conclusion' of Chapter 9.3 'Racism', closing line of the chapter
Q-025	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 287, Section 9.3.1 'Introduction', Casey quoting Dame Cressida Dick QPM (then Met Commissioner) giving oral evidence to the Home Affairs Committee 'Macpherson 22 years on', 8 July 2020 (footnote 182)
Q-026	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 287, Section 9.3.1 'Introduction', Casey quoting Acting Commissioner Sir Stephen House from the Metropolitan Police Service 2022 statement on the launch of the National Police Race Action Plan (footnote 183)
Q-023	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 317, Section 9.3.4 'The Met and Black Londoners', sub-section on stop and search, paragraph beginning 'In every year since 2016'
Q-024	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 305, Section 9.3.3 'The Met's workforce; the internal culture', sub-heading 'Experience of racism in the Met'
Q-027	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 285, Section 9.2.9 'Conclusion', closing finding (final sentence of the Sexism and Misogyny chapter)
Q-031	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 272, Section 9.2.5 'Life for women in the Met', Casey quoting a Metropolitan Police Service spokesperson statement made in response to a media report on the IOPC Operation Hotton Learning Report (footnote 164: The Guardian, 1 February 2022)
Q-032	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 259, Section 9.2.1 'Introduction', Casey quoting the Metropolitan Police Service statement of 4 April 2022 on the 'enhanced response to tackling violence against women and girls in London' (footnote 151)
Q-029	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 267, Section 9.2.5 'Life for women in the Met', Review survey findings box
Q-033	Metropolitan Police Service, Analytical Report — evidence to support Baroness Casey of Blackstock's conclusions about the current misconduct system in the Metropolitan Police Service (October 2022)	p. 14, Section 6 'There is sexism and misogyny in the misconduct system', paragraph reporting BCU survey results
Q-016	Baroness Casey Review (March 2023)	p. 282, Section 9.2 'Sexism and misogyny', sub-section 'Operation Rainier – the Met's review of sexual misconduct cases', bulleted findings under heading 'Vetting:'